<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Colorado Law Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.coloradolaw-blog.com,2010://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Colorado Law Blog" />
    <updated>2010-09-02T19:43:07Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Colorado legal and consumer advice</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.21-en</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Deadly Accident Where the Buffalo Roam</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/2010/09/deadly_accident_where_the_buff.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/mt-atom.cgi1" title="Deadly Accident Where the Buffalo Roam" />
    <id>tag:www.coloradolaw-blog.com,2010://1.296</id>
    
    <published>2010-09-02T19:40:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-02T19:43:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A trucker who had been driving the same route for 50 years had the bad luck of running into a lone bison on a highway just north of Byers earlier this week. The driver died after he hit the bison...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Linda Chalat</name>
        <uri>http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Of General Interest" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A trucker who had been driving the same route for 50 years had the bad luck of running into a lone bison on a highway just north of Byers earlier this week.  The driver died after he hit the bison and then swerved off the highway, rolling his rig.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="bison.jpg" src="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/bison.jpg" width="175" height="141" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>While collisions with cattle and wildlife are common -- about 3,000 a year in Colorado, according to the state highway department -- hitting a bison is rare.  The bison's owner won't face any criminal penalties, particularly because the fences along the highway are maintained by the state, said  a Colorado State Trooper. </p>

<p>Hitting a bison is not a minor incident - the animals stand about 6 feet tall and up to 2,000 pounds.  According to the Rocky Mountain Buffalo Association, Colorado has about 50 bison ranches with between 5,000 and 10,000 head. </p>

<p>According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, each year animal-vehicle collisions injure nearly 29,000 people, and cause more than 200 human fatalities and more than $1 billion in vehicle and other property damage.</p>

<p>In states such as Wyoming and Montana, where wild bison's' migratory routes are subdivided by roads and where grazing is common along open range, bison run-ins are more common. Over three days in Montana last year, 15 bison were killed by cars or trucks on a 10-mile stretch north of West Yellowstone. No humans were killed. Afterward, the Buffalo Field Campaign at Yellowstone National Park urged highway caution in a blog post.</p>

<p> Where open-range laws are in effect, ranchers don't have to fence in their livestock. If the neighbors want to keep cows off their land, they have to fence the beasts out.  The principle dates back to the 1800s, when cattle barons let their herds roam over public land and any private land that wasn't fenced off.</p>

<p>Thirteen Western states, including Colorado,  still have some kind of open-range law. Yet as the West becomes more populated, more people moving into rural neighborhoods are bothered by livestock straying onto their property, and increased traffic means more accidents involving livestock that stray onto roads. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Car Seat Safety</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/2010/08/car_seat_safety.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/mt-atom.cgi1" title="Car Seat Safety" />
    <id>tag:www.coloradolaw-blog.com,2010://1.295</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-31T16:35:23Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-31T16:48:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A nine-month-old baby boy died in a car accident near Glenwood Springs this week when he was ejected from his car seat. Colorado State Patrol investigators believe the parents did not want to wake the baby up and had left...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Linda Chalat</name>
        <uri>http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="New &amp; Changing Laws" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A nine-month-old baby boy died in a car accident near Glenwood Springs this week when he was ejected from his car seat.  Colorado State Patrol investigators believe the parents did not want to wake the baby up and had left him in the baby seat without the straps buckled around him.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The boy was in the backseat of a Honda Civic that was traveling westbound on Interstate when it lost control and hit the center median. The car rolled several times for 712 feet before landing on its wheels.</p>

<p>The boy's mother, the driver of the car, was wearing her seatbelt, and was transported to the hospital with moderate to severe injuries according to the Colorado State Patrol.</p>

<p>Colorado State Patrol reminds drivers that an estimated 90 percent of child seats are improperly installed.   And a new Colorado law requiring children in cars to be in booster seats until age 8 went into effect earlier this month. It increases the mandatory age for booster seats from 4 to 8 years old. Previously, Colorado required booster seats for all 4 year olds but only encouraged the use of booster seats for children between 4 years and 6 years.  See <a href="http://denver.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/keep-your-kids-in-a-booster-seat-its-the-law.aspx?googleid=283428">Keep Your Kids in a Booster Seat - It's the Law!</a></p>

<p>You can also find information online at <a href="http://www.carseatsColorado.com">www.carseatsColorado.com</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Making it Clear When Interpretation is Needed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/2010/08/making_it_clear_when_interpret.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/mt-atom.cgi1" title="Making it Clear When Interpretation is Needed" />
    <id>tag:www.coloradolaw-blog.com,2010://1.294</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-26T17:44:42Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-26T17:46:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last week, the Justice Department issued a letter to chief justices and state court administrators to help clarify the obligation &quot;to provide oral interpretation, written translation and other language services to people who are limited English proficient (LEP);&quot; all courts...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Linda Chalat</name>
        <uri>http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Of General Interest" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.coloradolaw-blog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week,  the Justice Department issued a letter to chief justices and state court administrators to help clarify the obligation "to provide oral interpretation, written translation and other language services to people who are limited English proficient (LEP);" all courts that receive federal financial assistance must provide such services.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The letter outlines four concerns for courts to address regarding the services they provide to LEP individuals:</p>

<p>1.	Interpreter assistance should not be limited to certain types of proceedings. Rather, qualified interpreter services must be provided at all court proceedings, as all court proceedings are considered critical by the DOJ, whether they be civil, criminal, or administrative. Non-party LEP individuals should also be provided with interpreter services when those persons' "presence or participation in a court matter is necessary or appropriate." <br />
2.	Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on national origin; "applicable civil rights laws require courts . . . to provide meaningful access to all civil, criminal or administrative hearings, at no charge to LEP individuals." Title VI prohibits court practices that would impair participation in proceedings, such as charging interpreter costs to one or more parties. "Language expenses should be treated as a basic and essential operating expense and not as an ancillary cost. . . . Fiscal pressures . . . do not provide an exemption from civil rights requirements." <br />
3.	Courtrooms are not the only location in which interpreter assistance may be necessary and required; "the meaningful access requirement extends to court functions that are conducted outside the courtroom as well." All points of public contact, such as records rooms, filing offices, detention facilities, and anger management classes, should have services available for LEP persons. <br />
4.	Lastly, those individuals involved in a case under court appointment or order, who are required to communicate with LEP parties, "must possess demonstrated bilingual skills or have support from professional interpreters." Effective communication with court officers, such as criminal defense counsel, court psychologists, probation officers, doctors, and trustees, is essential to provide meaningful access to justice for LEP persons. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

